In a victory for common sense, Freehold Managers have backed down in their attempts to impose sky-high charges for consent to alterations.
In the past year Warner residents asking for consent for a loft conversion have been asked to pay up to £15,000 simply for permission, but last week a persistent challenger was given consent at a more reasonable fee of £540.
The managing agents claimed their previous fee was based on a ‘standard’ Warner lease in which the loft is not part of the demised premises. However almost all the residents who took legal advice on this found that their leases clearly demised the loft space to them.
And yet curiously, when challenged by residents, FM used almost anything but the demised premises argument. For instance, they tried to make the case that the freeholder owned the air above the roofspace and could therefore charge for it.
Really? Well, actually, no. The cases of Davies v Yadegar (1989) and Haines v Florensa (1989) established that “a lease of the top part of a building which included the roof also included the airspace above the roof”.
Most Warner leases state that consent for alterations is not to be unreasonably withheld. Putting a high price on consent, unjustified by costs, is unreasonable and we advise residents to negotiate a more reasonable charge for consent.
If this fails, please get in touch. The First Tier Tribunal, which handles disputes between leaseholders and freeholders has told us it can hear the cases of several residents at one hearing. This option is still available to us if necessary.
Jayne says
This is brilliant news! We have just requested permission and have been asked for a £300 fee just for circle 33 to look at our request. Is this the norm and can we expect any other admin fees while they consider our request / how much to charge us?
Warner Resident says
Hi there,
We are in the process of consent for our Ex-Warner property. We were hoping to knock down a non-load bearing wall. We have provided Freehold Managers PLC with structural plans, council consent and all other information they requested. Upon review of this information they said they would be in a position to provide us with a rough overview of expected costs.
Following receipt of this info, they have now claimed that we will have to pay an extortionate amount for their surveyor to conduct a survey. They are also refusing to confirm any other potential costs that we could expect due to this being unprofessional.
Has anyone else experienced this problem before? Are there any precedents in place here? Any advice would be welcomed.
Thanks